More Pages: brazil Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36


Look For Another Guide Book
Needs to be updated
Hey Relax, This is Rio. City of Marvel

Horrible!This book is also very aloof, and hardly forms a "relationship" with the reader. All the explanations are not in-depth. New grammar and vocabulary is just explained with a sentence, and then the reader is left on his/her own.
Here's an example of an exercise:
Exercise 2
Can you remember what the following are in Portuguese?
duty-free, boarding card, departure board, non-smoking, passport control, departure lounge, departure gate
No, I can't remember what they are-all I was given was a list of words!
Compared to Colloquial Icelandic(which is an EXCELLENT Colloquial course), this book is severely lacking, and that is quite surprising. A language spoken by around 200,000 people is taught so much more in depth than one spoken by almost 200,000,000!
Not enough audio
Good reference book

Look elsewhere for information regarding Rio
Good option to Rio
Useful and beautiful

Avoid this book
Brazil Places and History

Be careful, intellectuals can be hazardous to your wealthThe problem with so-called intellectuals in Brazil is that Georg Hegel(1770-1831) of the police-state philosophy and and Karl Marx(1818-1883) economic determinism are the end of history and there is nothing else worth considering. On page 75 Cardoso says "A study of the history of ideas in the twentieth century would show that each generation of critical intellectuals seeks to revive Marxism with anew breath of life. The crust of so-called "vulgar Marxism" is so recurring that it must have something to do with Marxism itself." Perhaps because Cardoso is a former teacher, and recalls the old axiom of "publish or perish", he is prone to taking a clear, concise proposition and expanding it into a chapter obfuscated with dialectic garbage.
Cardoso writes a great deal about democracy and democratization. The reader must recognise that his definitions are much different from ours, particularly "radicalized democracy". Cardoso governs by Medidas Provisorias which require legislative approval (similar to our Executive Orders). When he gets a rubber stamp approval he hails this as democracy in action. If the approval is not forthcoming, he has other less complimentary words. His knee-jerk approach to issuing MPs frequently requires repeated revisions before he gets them right. In the last seven years he has issued 237 MPs requiring 4,032 reeditions.
Cardoso is a friend of Anthony Giddens of the London School of Economics, proponent of what is called "The Third Way". The Third way is not a creation of Giddens. It originated in Germany under Adolph Hitler's National Socialist party. When ask why he did not nationalize industry, Hitler replied "I don't need to, the owners will do what I tell them to do." Cardoso has privatized a great deal of what was government owned industry but for different reasons. Brazil does not have a free market economy but a central planned economy keyed to providing maximum employment. They do not have any understanding or concern for market demand. If an industry such as steel or sugar produces more than the market needs, they look for a wy to dump the excess at below cost. The United States and Canada have both passed antidumping laws which Cardoso calls unfair.
When the Real Plan was introduced on Friday, 1 July 1994, 1 Real equaled 1 US Dollar. On Monday, 4 July 1994 when people went to exchange their money, the value of the Real had been inflated to US$1.05. They were encouraged to exchange their 'weak' dollars for 'strong' Reals. Few people realized that 4 July was American holiday and all US banks and financial institutions were closed. In a short time the value of the Real was inflated to US$1.20. The Cardoso goverment went on a borrow and spend for about three years until it could not borrow any more and had to be bailed out by the IMF to the tune of about 40 billion dollars. Today the Real is only worth about 40 US cents, the public debit is about forty percent of the gross domestic product, electricity is rationed, and Brazil is back at the IMF looking for another 19 billion to tide it over till Cardoso leaves office. What course has he charted for himself, I wonder.
From Theory to Practice: a Scholar turned President

Fawning BiographyFernando Henrique Cardoso grew up in Sao Paulo, Brazil where he studied sociology and Marxism. He went into exile after Brazil's 1964 military coup, living in Chile and France, before returning to Brazil to found a leftist think tank. Cardoso's 1969 book, "Dependency and Development in Latin America", was a seminal work that established his reputation as a world-class sociologist. Joining the opposition party in the 1970s, Cardoso eventually became a Senator and a key drafter of the 1988 constitution. He captured the Brazilian imagination in 1994 as Finance Minister when his "Real Plan" tamed hyperinflation. Launched by this success, he was elected President that same year.
As the book's analysis demonstrates, Cardoso's greatest asset was his flexibility. For, unlike many of his contemporary intellectuals, Cardoso was not a doctrinaire Marxist who insisted on squeezing modern realities into the mold of his pre-conceived ideology. Instead, he used Marxism and his own dependency theory as working models to identify solutions to real problems. He was, in this sense, a pragmatic and effective applied social scientist. For those readers familiar with Cardoso as president, this book provides useful background demonstrating how he --like the president who followed him, Lula da Silva-- moved from the far left toward the center over his career. This evolution allowed Cardoso, and Lula, to gain the confidence of the financial classes and win national elections.
The book is strongest, not surprisingly, in explaining sociological principles. Author Goertzel is a sociology professor at home describing academic environments and Marxist minutiae. But it is weakest on the economic and political analyses that are critical to understanding Cardoso's terms as president. There are many factual errors whose cumulative effect undermines the credibility of the entire book. Thus the Planalto Palace is incorrectly described as a "two-story office building" (it has four stories); Cardoso ally Antonio Carlos Magalhaes is termed a "distinguished senator" (he is a thoroughly corrupt machine politician). We learn (p.164) that a two-thirds congressional majority is required to amend the constitution (a three-fifths majority is required); and that the 1997 global economic crisis began in Hong Kong (it began in Thailand). The book refers (p.193) to Brazil's congressional districts (Brazil has no congressional districts, all candidates run statewide); and confuses the Bank of Brazil with the government Central Bank.
Even more serious is the inability to balance affection for Cardoso with insightful criticism. From a pointless description of Cardoso's first college term paper to its overuse of the word "brilliant" to describe the subject, the book never rises beyond the level of highbrow fanzine. Though he spent some time in Brazil in the 1960s, the author is no Brazilianist and his analysis of events often slips into facile generalizations ("Many Brazilians of humble means do not want their president to be a common person like themselves."). The worst analysis occurs where complicated events call for critical review, there is just no attempt to criticize Cardoso. Thus readers get apologizes, rather than serious analysis, of Cardoso's failure to implement land reform and intellectual flip-flops that pre-load conclusions most flattering to Cardoso. For example on p.162, readers learn that the constitution limits the powers of the presidency, yet two paragraphs later we read that the president has "formidable powers". There is a similar about-face on the views of economist Rudiger Dornbusch. Overall, the economic analysis is particularly shallow (the author refers on p.164 to alleged "international guidelines" on a country's deficit spending).
The concluding paragraph is so weak that readers who have made it to the end can only shake their heads. For after describing how Brazil in the 1990s failed to implement fundamental reforms, the last page tells us "Congress was rapidly passing much needed reforms", and lamely concludes "If the new commitment to reform can be sustained, the country's long-term prospects are good." The book is not a total failure, but it has serious weaknesses and a grating pro-Cardoso bias that suggests it is the Cardoso fans' attempt to get in the first word on his historical legacy. It is most useful for students of Brazil who will balance it with other readings.
Sociologist *as* politician, or *and* politician?That said, the book has many good points. It has an excellent analysis of Brazil's politics of the last 8 years. Prof. Goertzel shows a remarkable, even uncanny, penetration of the Brazilian left's thinking. However, the author's knowledge of Brazil's history grows hazier the further he goes back into the past. Up to the seventies the narrative is extremely vague, and occasionally erroneous, when it describes events not related to Cardoso personally. A previous knowledge of Brazilian history and economics is indispensable to understand Cardoso's historical role fully. Those who read this book without such a previous knowledge will, I fear, fail to grasp many essential points, such as the precise nature of Brazil's military regime in 1964-85 and the extent to which inflation dominated - and up to a point still does - Brazil's ecomomy and politics. But it is a well-written narrative, extremely readable.


invisibility is the key word here!

fairly helpful

Closely-argued economic history of agriculture in Bahia

Interesting, but NOT an identification guideNowhere does he discuss the birds' appearances at all. There are six nice color plates and some excellent line drawings, but in total these show only about 100 birds, and are not planned with identification in mind in any case.
Brazil includes an amazing bibliography, totaling over 1000 entries going back to the early 1800s. The bibliography alone is worth the price of the book. In his text, however, he does not limit his citations to the bibliography but also references a large number his own personal observations and communications from other observers.
Mark Brazil is a major authority on Japanese birds, and this book is valuable in many ways. But it is in no sense an identification guide.
I have resided in Rio for years and purchased the book for visitors whom I can not attend as fully as I would like. However, this book would only serve to gear my guests towards a disappointing vacation relative to what they could experience.
Although the book is written by a Carioca (a Rio native), she apparently has not been out much in the last couple of years, despite the book's year 2000 copyright.
Only 1 of the Top 10 Disco Clubs may be worthy of being listed, whereas the #1 burned down back around 1996 and the #10 virtually went out of business over a year ago. Her #4 "known to be a tourist hangout" is better known as a whore house. Not 1 of Rio's top dance clubs is actually listed here.
The Top 10 Seafood Restaurants fails to include Satyricon, arguably one of Rio's finest, however the author ackowledges it as "one of the best seafood restaurants in town" in her Top 10 Medium Priced Restaurants (though it is not medium priced). The book is full of similar inconsistencies.
The Top 10 Churrascarias (all you can eat steak houses) lists several that are a la carte only, including the (Australian) Outback Steakhouse, an unnecessary destination considering all the great local establishments.
The Top 10 Fresh Juice Shops fails to include some of Rio's best, as well as most famous and popular.
The Top 10 Wine Bars have little or nothing to do with wine, and at best offer a poor selection. And of course some of these establishments have been closed for years.
Admittedly, the book does include many places worth visiting, though not in the order presented. As a first time visitor in 1987 and a first time resident in 1996, with experience hosting visitors from the USA and elsewhere, my suggestions is look for another guide book.